![]() |
PR spam negatively affects PR industry's reputationIn October of last year, Chris Anderson, the editor-in-chief of Wired magazine, published a list of all the email addresses of PR people that had “spammed” him in the previous month. The list included names from top US and international PR companies such as Edelman and Weber Shandwick. It caused a roaring discussion on his blog, with many other journalists adding their frustration and applauding Anderson for giving “the PRs some of their own medicine”. Just recently, another journalist and blogger created a PR Spammers blacklist, listing the domains of (mostly) PR companies who used their personal email address to send unsolicited or irrelevant PR pitches. Sheer enormitySome public relations practitioners have argued that, as a journalist, it is your job to receive press releases and do the research to find the right stories. Some PR comments on Chris Anderson's blog suggested that if he didn't want to do that, then he should've become a plumber instead. Good argument, except for the fact that the people thinking this way do not realise the sheer enormity of the problem experienced by journalists. As Kevin Dugan from The Bad Pitch Blog said, it is “JUST. THAT. BAD”. Unfortunately, in South Africa, the situation isn't any better. I've spoken to one South African journalist, who receives up to 800 emails a day, of which a great percentage is completely irrelevant, or addressed to the wrong person, the wrong target market or the wrong beat. With this constant flow of “PR spam”, you start to see why the love-hate relationship between media and PR can sometimes tip quite severely to the latter half of the balance. But of course, journalists do rely on the PR content they receive to help fill their newspapers and magazines every month. There are many editors who are grateful for the excellent ideas and media releases they receive from really good PR professionals - of which there are many. However, what we need to seriously consider is that if one journalist is receiving hundreds of irrelevant PR emails a day, there are certainly many more. (The ongoing media research that Encyclomedia does with journalists can confirm this.) And in order for journalists across SA and around the world to be experiencing this problem, it means that there must be many, many PR companies that have developed bad habits. Listen to feedbackWe can choose to become defensive and argue that journalists are rude, arrogant and lazy. Indeed, certain journalists undeniably are. But those sorts of arguments only serve to point out the errors in others, while ignoring our own. Let's listen to the feedback we're getting and think of how we can improve our own situation, so as to elevate our industry to the professional level we wish to see it at. The real issue that we face is not so much about whether publicists are using spam tactics or not - that can be argued back and forth - but rather, the fact that this very negative perception exists. Suggestions to fix the problem: (please comment to this and add your own)
About the authorRobynn Burls is the co-founder of Encyclomedia - the online media database that aims to help PR practitioners “build relationships, not lists” with highly detailed, intelligent media information. Go to www.Encyclomedia.co.za or contact Robynn on +27 (0)21 552 8096. She's also the editor of www.PRacticalRelations.com. |