Subscribe & Follow
Advertise your job vacancies
Sudanese editor released
Publisher and editor of the al-Sudani have been released after several days in detention, however the newspaper remains suspended.
Reporters Without Borders has called for the lifting of a ban on the Arabic-language daily al-Sudani, under a highly controversial article of criminal code procedure, over an editorial accusing the justice minister of "lying in a money-laundering case".
The worldwide press freedom organisation however welcomed the release of the publisher and editor of the privately-owned paper, Mahgub Erwa and Osman Mirghani, who had been imprisoned on 17 May 2007 and were respectively released on 19 and 20 May.
"This case typifies one of the most glaring obstacles to press freedom in Sudan," the organisation said. "The banning of al-Sudani is unwarranted in that it was decided unilaterally by the government, while there is a press regulation body whose authority was by-passed."
"Yet again the government based its decision on Article 130 of the criminal code procedure when the entire profession and the National Press Council have all challenged its validity."
Mahgoub Erwa was freed on 19 May, 24 hours before the end of his preventive detention period. Osman Mirghani, was released on 20 May on the orders of a court which refused to extend his detention, as requested by the public ministry.
The misuse of Article 130, which punishes any breach of the confidentiality of investigations, is supposedly one of the authorities' favourite weapons. Since the start of 2007, al-Sudani has fallen victim to this ambiguous piece of legislation which is supposed to prevent "influence being brought to bear on an on-going investigation".
On 1 February 2007, the justice ministry banned the paper "indefinitely" for referring to the 2006 murder of the editor of the daily al-Wifaq, Mohammed Taha, in defiance of a government imposed blackout on the case on the pretext of "preserving public order" (see IFEX report for more details - 2 February).
Protests from professional organisations - and from the National Press Council, close to the government, which questioned the legality of the decision - resulted in a climb-down by the authorities 48 hours later.
Article published courtesy of RSF
