Subscribe & Follow
Jobs
- Sales and Business Development Manager Cape Town
- Content Curator Ilovo, Sandton
- Digital Archive Intern Cape Town
- Junior Digital Art and Social Media Marketing Coordinator Johannesburg
- Digital Marketing Learnership Cape Town
- CRM Digital Manager (6-Month Contract) Johannesburg
- CRM Digital Admin / Consultant (6-Month Contract) Johannesburg
- Social Media Manager Cape Town
- Videographer and Video Editor Tshwane
- Multi Media Journalist | South Coast Sun Durban
Videos, views and vanity metrics - how to really measure success
While views are the most obvious metric, they can also be the most deceptive. As the options for paid video content increase and platforms experiment with auto-play functionality, the waters are becoming increasingly muddied for measuring success.
Spend = Reach (not resonance)
To prove a point about just how superficial video views can be as an indicator of good content, an experiment was conducted by American agency, Solve. Showing how even the most uncreative content can rack up a high number of views when backed by the right spend, they posted a completely blank four-minute video to YouTube. No sound, no witty description, literally no content.
The video was promoted with spend (where the agency would be charged for every viewer who watched beyond 30 seconds of the clip). The result? Over 100,000 views from an investment of just $1400 - meaning they paid 1.4 cents per view (what would generally be considered a very good return). A total of 22% of all viewers also watched the full four-minute clip without skipping, but the video garnered a sum total of zero likes or shares.
What does this mean? Essentially that you can put any content in front of a pretty massive audience if you have a budget - and they'll probably watch it too. But that won't guarantee they'll actually like it, enjoy it or resonate with it in any way.
False indicators
That's not to say that views don't mean anything at all. After all, the most viral YouTube videos of all time did not break viewership records by being backed by millions in ad spend - they spread by organic interaction (the digital equivalent of word-of-mouth).
The point is: views alone can be a false indicator of successful content. When a video has a high number of views but a low number of likes, comments or shares, it's a clear indication of paid viewership.
Real measures of success
So how do you accurately gauge the success of your video content? True value can be gauged by these measurements:
1. Organic views
Even amazing content needs to initially be boosted by spend - especially on social platforms such as Facebook, where organic reach has been throttled to zero. But the real test is then whether your video content views continue to rise even when your spend has stopped. Sometimes all it takes is that initial boost to get social word-of-mouth started.
2. Shares
A share is as close to a holy grail as social interactions get. If your content is being shared, the audience reach will grow exponentially. The endorsement that often comes with the act of sharing is also key to understanding how, and if, your content resonates with people.
3. Comments and feedback
What is the general sentiment of the feedback you're receiving on your video content? Did it evoke any strong reactions? Are the reactions in line with or completely against what you had hoped to see?